Australian heritage practice rests on the Burra Charter (Australia ICOMOS), which defines cultural significance as the aesthetic, historic, scientific, social or spiritual value a place holds for past, present or future generations. That value can live in the place, its fabric, its setting and its use — and, crucially, in people’s associations and meanings. This last point matters enormously for Aboriginal heritage: significance is not only what can be measured or excavated, but the meaning a place holds for living communities.
Both NSW and the ACT translate these values into formal criteria. A place need only meet one criterion to be significant, but a proper assessment tests it against all of them.
NSW uses seven criteria set by the Heritage Council of NSW (the Assessing Heritage Significance guidelines):
Each is tested at a level: local significance (council Local Environmental Plan) or State significance (the State Heritage Register, under the Heritage Act 1977). Above these sit the Commonwealth National Heritage List and World Heritage.
Aboriginal cultural heritage is assessed across the same Burra Charter values, but two distinct dimensions must both be considered:
This is why community consultation is a core, legislated part of the assessment — and why a place can carry very high cultural significance even where there is little physical archaeology to see. In NSW, Aboriginal objects are protected under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 regardless of whether land is listed.
The ACT is more consolidated: a single law, the Heritage Act 2004, covers natural, historic and Aboriginal heritage, and significance is assessed against the criteria in section 10 (the nationally agreed HERCON criteria). A place or object is significant if it meets one or more of: importance to the course or pattern of the ACT’s history; rarity; research potential; importance in demonstrating the principal characteristics of a class; valued aesthetic characteristics; a high degree of creative or technical achievement; or a strong or special association with a community for social, cultural or spiritual reasons, including significance under Aboriginal tradition. The ACT Heritage Council assesses significance and must consult the Representative Aboriginal Organisations on Aboriginal heritage.
| NSW | ACT | |
| Law (Aboriginal) | National Parks & Wildlife Act 1974 (AHIP) | Heritage Act 2004 |
| Law (historic) | Heritage Act 1977 | Heritage Act 2004 (same Act) |
| Criteria | 7 criteria (Heritage Council of NSW) | s 10 / HERCON criteria |
| Community body | Registered Aboriginal Parties (RAPs) | Representative Aboriginal Organisations (RAOs) |
The underlying values are very similar — both rest on the Burra Charter — but the legal machinery, terminology and the body you deal with differ, so advice prepared for one jurisdiction should never be assumed to carry over to the other.
Here is the reassurance most developers are looking for: a finding of significance is not a refusal. It means the heritage values are now on the table and must be identified, weighed and managed — through the right report (a Statement of Heritage Impact, an ACHAR leading to an AHIP, or a CHA/SHE in the ACT), by showing impacts are avoided where reasonable and otherwise justified and mitigated, and often by adjusting the design so significant elements are retained or respected. Most significant places can still be developed. What changes is the level of scrutiny and the need to show the impact is acceptable. The projects that run into trouble are almost always the ones that left heritage to the end — so engaging heritage advice at concept stage is the single most effective thing you can do to keep a project on track.
General information, current as at 03 June 2026; not legal advice. NSW is progressing reforms to its Aboriginal cultural heritage framework — we keep our advice current. Contact COLCO for guidance specific to your site.
No. A finding of significance means the heritage values must be identified and managed in your proposal — not that development is refused. Most significant places can still be developed with a design that respects or mitigates the values.
In NSW, councils assess local items and the Heritage Council of NSW assesses State items, while Aboriginal cultural significance is determined with the Aboriginal community. In the ACT, the ACT Heritage Council assesses significance against the section 10 criteria, consulting Representative Aboriginal Organisations on Aboriginal heritage.
Yes — particularly for Aboriginal cultural heritage. Significance includes social, historic and spiritual value held by the community, so a place can be highly significant even where physical archaeological remains are limited.
Speak with the COLCO team, led by Dr Sophie Collins — senior heritage expertise for the capital region. Canberra-based, servicing the ACT and NSW.
Request a consultation